|
Case
|
Court
|
Gaziyya No.
|
Type of claim
|
Date case registered
|
Status
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-CA-G/2013/005
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA's decision
|
21 Apr 2013
|
No hearings held as of date
|
|
|
High Court
|
2013/HC-A/113
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 1478/Cv-C/2011
|
31 Mar 2013
|
No hearings held as of date
|
|
|
High Court
|
2013/HC-A/110
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 2155/Cv-C/2011
|
28 Mar 2013
|
1 hearing held as of date
|
|
|
Civil Court
|
0412/Cv-C/2013
|
Not allowing deductions of input tax against output tax in relation to transactions between parties that are not registered for GST under the Goods and Services Tax Act (Law No: 10/2011) is in violation with Article 20, 40 (a), 63 and 67 (a) of the Constitution. Therefore, to declare that tax shall not be collected in the said manner.
|
19 Feb 2013
|
Case dismissed as the plaintiff had no locus standi in the present case.
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-CA-B/2013/004
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA's decision
|
18 Feb 2013
|
2 hearings held as of date
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-CA-G/2013/003
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA's decision
|
14 Feb 2013
|
Procedural judgement passed. 3 hearings held as of date
|
|
|
Civil Court
|
245/Cv-C/2013
|
Regarding the lease agreement made with respect to B. Maamaduvvari
|
06 Feb 2013
|
1 hearing held as of date
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-003/TGST/2013
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA's decision
|
23 Jan 2013
|
Procedural judgement passed. 3 hearings held as of date
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-004/MISC/2013
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA's decision
|
23 Jan 2013
|
Procedural judgement passed. 3 hearings held up to date.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2013/HC-DM/01
|
Section 29 of the Tax Administration Act (Law No: 3/2010) is in violation with Article 47 (b) of the Constitution. Therefore, to repeal Section 29 of the Act.
|
17 Jan 2013
|
Procedural judgement passed by the High Court was appealed by the Attorney General's Office to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court served an order against the High Court Judgement.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2013/HC-A/06
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 1976/Cv-C/2011
|
09 Jan 2013
|
2 hearings held as of date
|
|
|
Civil Court
|
0006/Cv-C/2013
|
As the MIRA acted ultra vires to the Tax Appeal Tribunal’s search warrant and Section 12 (c) and (d) of the Tax Appeal Tribunal Regulation by not delivering the possession of the seized properties, to recover the seized properties under the search warrant.
|
02 Jan 2013
|
4 hearings held as of date
|
|
|
High Court
|
2012/HC-A/351
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 2155/Cv-C/2011
|
27 Dec 2012
|
Case dismissed by the High Court as appellant failed to make representations.
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-001/MISC/2012
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA Audit Notice 220/PRIV/2012/4710 (3 December 2012)
|
16 Dec 2012
|
4 hearings held up to date.
|
|
|
Tax Appeal Tribunal
|
TAT-002/MISC/2012
|
Case appealed with regard to MIRA Audit Notice 220/PRIV/2012/4711 (3 December 2012)
|
16 Dec 2012
|
4 hearings held up to date.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2012/HC-DM/09
|
Section 37 of the First Amendment to Tax Administration Act (Law No: 14/2011) contradicts with Article 40(a) and 56 of the Constitution. Therefore, to repeal Section 37 of the Amendment.
|
14 Oct 2012
|
2 hearings held up to date.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2012/HC-A/150
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 1974/Cv-C/2011
|
20 May 2012
|
Case closed in favour of the MIRA on 12 May 2013.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2011/HC-DM/06
|
Section 51 of the GST Act contradicts with Article 17 and 20 of the Constitution. Further, Section 64 of the GST Act is in contravention with Article 16 of the Constitution. Therefore, the claim is to repeal Section 51 of the GST Act.
|
05 Oct 2011
|
A Temporary Order was passed on 12 October 2011 with respect to a request for a Court Order by the Claimant. However, a Judgment has not been passed yet.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2011/HC-DM/05
|
The commencement date determined under Section 79(a) of the BPT Regulation contradicts with the BPT Act. Therefore, the claim is to repeal the said Section.
|
13 Sep 2011
|
Judgement pending from 29 February 2012 onwards.
|
|
|
High Court
|
2011/HC-A/195
|
Case appealed with regard to Gaziyya number 1068/Cv-C/2011
|
11 Aug 2011
|
Case closed in favour of the MIRA on 29 November 2012.
|